Cinema Paradiso (Italian, Nuovo cinema Paradiso)

Movie: Cinema Paradiso

Year: 1988

Director: Giuseppe Tornatore

Language: Italian

Synopsis: Salvatore Di Vita starts this journey back home after he comes to know that Alfredo has died. Salvatore who is a movie maker takes us back on a flashback to his childhood where as a young boy named Toto he was fascinated by movies and is taken as an apprentice by Alfredo the projectionist. The fatherly Alfredo supports the passion of Toto for movies and in due course of time teaches him how to use the projector from a stool as his height would not allow him to reach. The beautiful arrangement comes to an abrupt end when there is a fire in the theater which causes Alfredo to lose his eyesight. The new cinema paradise is built and it hires Toto as the projectionist. The bond between him and Alfredo grows stronger. Very soon Salvatore starts experimenting with filmmaking. He meets Elena and falls in love with her and finally woos her. But her dad takes her away and Toto goes for his military service. When he comes back Alfredo tells him that the town is too small for his dream. He should leave never returning to visit, never to give in to nostalgia, never to even write or think about them.

My own take: The strength of the movie lies in its simplicity. Very simply told and very beautifully portrayed. In fact the last scene is amazing when Toto finds that Alfredo has left behind as gift to the young boy the stool where he used to stand and a reel of all kissing scenes that the old man had not let the little boy see when he was just a kid. The censoring he did goes a full circle and comes back to Salvatore. Sometimes its heart warming to see simple people do simple things. Maybe its aspirational for many of us to be like how our parents wanted us to be : )

9 Songs (English)

Movie: 9 Songs

Year: 2004

Director: Micheal Winterbottom

Language: English

Synopsis:As a story the story can be summarized in what is the oldest modern day love story ever. Man meets woman. They fall in love. They enjoy their time together. Then they fall apart and she walks away. But wait if it were that simple why would I be writing it as one of my favourite movies and that too given its in English and I don’t write about Hollywood and Bollywood movies. The beauty of the movie is the fact that each phase of the relationship Matt goes to a concert and the songs actually fit into the current stage of the relationship. Very emotion is expressed in songs which are predominantly rock but some are classical pieces. But each song tells a story. The dialogues in the movie are minimal but the story is complete. The songs in chronological order are
Black Rebel Motorcycle Club, "Whatever Happened to My Rock and Roll"
The Von Bondies, "C'mon, C'mon""
Elbow, "Fallen Angel"
Primal Scream, "Movin' On Up"
Dandy Warhols, "You Were the Last High"
Super Furry Animals, "Slow Life"
Franz Ferdinand, "Jacqueline"
Michael Nyman, "Debbie"
Black Rebel Motorcycle Club, "Love Burns"

My own take: Well I can imagine why this movie has been given the highest possible adult rating in all countries for being the most sexually explicit movie. There have been times when people have tried seeing this movie and come back saying that its nothing more than endless scenes of lovemaking often in the same room. I hence would like to warn viewers that if that disturbs you please don’t venture to watch this movie. The movie actually keeps changing the narrative from present to past and shows the story from Matt’s point of view. There is a reference to his climatology study in Antarctica and that voice in the background mingles with the story of the love lost in that fateful summer. The music only adds up to the build up and I find the usage fantastic. If there has been a time in your life when you had love flowing freely into your life and u fooled yourself to believe that the world owed it to you. And then when the feeling evaporated you tried real hard to get back the vapor slipping from your palm without losing your perceived ego. You know what I mean. Serious watch. Depressing but thought provoking and a different way to tell a story

3 Iron (Korean: Bin Jip)

Movie: 3 Iron

Year: 2004

Director: Kim Ki-duk

Language: Korean

Synopsis:Tae Suk is a drifter on a bike and goes around dropping take out menus to different people across the city. Later in the night when he returns to find that some menus have not been taken he breaks open into these houses and stays there. He doesn’t enter these with the motive of burglary but uses it as his home. He takes care of the house. Cleans the house, repairs the instruments and quietly vanishes before the owners are back. In one of these attempts he comes across a battered wife of a rich guy, Sun Wha. Sun Wha who is assaulted and injured many times doesn’t say anything when Tae Suk breaks into her house. She hides and observes him from a distance till the point when he realizes that she had seen him all along. Tae Suk leaves and returns after much contemplation. He finds Sun Wha being abused by her husband. He hits the husband using golf balls and they elope. Both of them start living in apartments they break into. After a mixed bag of events they get caught in an apartment where an old man had died. Tae Suk is arrested and sentenced. In jail he practices becoming a shadow which allows him to be invisible because he is always at 180 degrees behind the person in front. He goes back to Sun Wha, only this time her husband is not able to see him in the house. Very weird

My own take: It takes you sometime before you realize that the two main characters in the movie have no dialogue at all. The story is told only by the supporting cast who speak. The strength of the movie comes also from the fact that they have used the actors to convey their feelings only through actions, so it leaves a lot to the imagination of the viewers. Watch the movie for the cinematic experience and also for the different story. Couple of scenes are very different and leave a mark. For example one of my favorite scenes is one in which Tae Suk goes into a photographers house and reorganizes a picture to add his artistic bit. Typical Kim Ki-duk kind of direction which has a lot of symbolism. Evening after office type watch

Rashomon (Japanese)

Movie: Rashomon

Year: 1950

Director: Akira Kurosawa

Language: Japanese

Synopsis:There are couple of things which are as timeless as this movie. The plot revolves around the rape of a woman and the murder of her husband, a samurai, by a bandit in the forest. There are five witnesses to this incident and they come to testify in the court. There is a monk, a woodcutter, the bandit, the wife and the samurai who comes via a medium. The story revolves around how all these people have a different view of the same incident and everyone adds his/her own perception to the thing. This adds to the problems as most people are also trying to explain the incident from their own view points to save themselves. The complex plot leads us into very significant questions on honor, trust, desire, lust and pride.

My own take: Few classics in the cinematic world achieve such rare levels of cult status. This movie has not just inspired many movies, series and plays but also finds mention in literature. The beauty of the movie comes from the way how everybody’s truth and lies differ. The truth is never found eventually because the truth is all dependent on the individuals and all of them are convicts in some way or the other. The guilt in each individual as well as the attempt to save themselves determines the stories. The movie actually throws up a very important question that if the essential data is kept intact the interpretation is completely dependent on the stakeholders. A masterpiece that has been around for over 50 years and even today anyone watching world movies will find it extremely enjoyable. Must watch

The Lives of Others (German: Das Leben der Anderen)

Movie: The Lives of Others

Year: 2006

Director: Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck

Language: German

Synopsis:The drama is set in 1984 in East Germany. We are introduced to Wiesler who is an interrogator at the Stasi and is known to be really good in his work. In his personal life he is a loner and a favorite of Grubitz who is his friend and superior. Grubitz wants Wiesler to spy on playwright Georg Dreyman, who is suspected of pro-Western sympathies. Stasi agents secretly enter Dreyman's flat, install small microphones and then monitor activity from the attic space above. Wiesler believes in the cause of the government completely and hence has unparalleled loyalty to the cause. However very soon he finds that the real reason behind the surveillance is that a minister named Hempf desires Dreyman's girlfriend, actress Christa-Maria Sieland. Dreyman's arrest would rid Hempf of a rival. Wiesler, a true believer in the socialist regime, is disillusioned by a minister abusing his powers for personal interests. Christa- Maria on the other hand sees Hempf secretly as she is scared to turn down such a powerful person. Wiesler who secretly doesn’t like the way dissidents are treated and feels that they deserve some compassion secretly arranges a Dreyman and Maria confrontation to clear the air. As they confront one of Dreyman’s friend commits suicide. This finally spurs Dreyman into speaking out against the regime. He arranges to anonymously publish an article on carefully concealed suicide rates in the GDR in the West German magazine Der Spiegel. Because all typewriters are registered, Dreyman uses a typewriter smuggled in from the West with a red ribbon to write the article, which he hides under the threshold between two rooms of his apartment. Before discussing sensitive issues in the flat, Dreyman and his friends try to test whether the flat is bugged by a feigned attempt at smuggling. However, out of compassion, Wiesler fails to pass on the information, making the conspirators think that the flat is not bugged. Though Wiesler intended his inactivity to be a one-time move, his compassion for the couple grows and he continues to lie in his reports to protect Dreyman, and also reduces surveillance hours, so that he no longer has to share the work with an assistant, who will not try to protect them. The story progresses all the way till unification of the Germanies and finally ends in Dreyman learning from Hempf that he was under full surveillance probing into his Stasi file, he finds out that, while agent "HGW XX/7" had heard Dreyman's activity against the regime he had prevented Dreyman from being found out. At the final page, a smudge of red ink reveals the agent's contact with the hidden typewriter. Dreyman succeeds in locating Wiesler, and he watches for a few minutes from a distance as Wiesler goes about his new job delivering advertising leaflets. Two years later, Dreyman publishes a novel, “Sonata for a Good Man” dedicated "To HGW XX/7, with gratitude".

My own take: The movie won the Best Foreign Language Movie in 2007 Academy Awards and definitely deserves this. The beauty of the movie is the internal strife that Wiesler goes through when he starts this particular assignment. I had read a story long back about a Japanese interrogator who was a loner because he could look through people. And the story told about how his talent was his curse. Wiesler strongly reminds me of that character. The reason he feels so strongly for this couple suddenly even after doing so many successful assignments is because he realizes somewhere in between, that he is spying on two individuals who are not a threat as is made to believe. And his actions that follow which make him go through a series of terrible events but make him hold on to his values. Sometimes I get a feeling that maybe he is trying to atone for his guilt of the past or maybe his emotions let him to believe that if he can get it right just this one time maybe he will be forgive himself? The movie is a sensitive portrayal of the relationship between Dreyman and Maria and is beautiful in parts. Not a light watch and will leave you with some points to ponder. The last shot where both the characters acknowledge each other is very unique.

Il Postino (Italian)

Movie: Il Postino

Year: 1994

Director: Michael Radford

Language: Italian

Synopsis:In a small village in coastal Italy Mario, the son of a fisherman, takes the job of a postman. His only work is to deliver letters to Pablo Neruda the famous Chilean poet who is staying on that island on exile. Neruda has been exiled to Italy due to his communist views. Slowly the movie explores the development of a friendship between Neruda and Mario. Mario develops a love for poetry and helped by Neruda starts using his new found communication skills to woo the lady of his dreams, Beatrice. Almost at the same time both Mario and Beatrice get married and Pablo leaves Italy for his country. Years later Pablo revisits the village to find out that Beatrice in the same café along with her son. She hands him a sound recording that Mario had made for Pablo of various sounds of his life…and it leads to the sound of his being killed while trying to get on stage to read a poem of Pablo.

My own take: The best description of this movie is poetry brought to life. The movie is so beautiful that it builds its story around the scenery and characters in one fluid motion. The character of Mario is so lovable that it touches your heart in many ways. You empathize with him when he struggles to get his love or when he seeks advice from the elderly poet. The director manages to bring smiles when Mario tries to get the love of his life. And then the emotions change when the pain of separation makes Mario do things to get back the friendship he had with Pablo. The last scenes when Pablo gets the tape which capture the sounds that Mario wanted the poet to hear are heart wrenching. Trivia about the movie- Massimo Troisi the postman in the movie actually died of a heart attack about 12 hours after the last shot of the movie. He was postponing his surgery for the movie. Must watch if you dont want to miss out a serious classic.

Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter... and Spring (Korean: Bom yeoreum gaeul gyeoul geurigo bom)

Movie: Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter... and Spring

Year: 2003

Director: Kim Ki-duk

Language: Korean

Synopsis:The movie begins in a small lake inside a forest that has a floating monastery. The monk and his young apprentice spend time going into the forest and collecting herbs and praying. The young monk one day finds it amusing to tie rocks to a fish, a frog and a snake. The teacher seeing this ties a rock to the apprentice and tells him that he shall free him from the torment only after he frees the other animals. He also tells him that if any one of them is dead he will carry the stone in his heart for the rest of his life. Years later there is a young lady who comes to the monastery to cure herself of a strange disease. The young monk slowly explores the feelings of love and experiments with his feelings. As events unfold his life is told in seasons which are set many years apart. The story moves from his running away from the monastery to finally coming back years later and then finally taking over as the caretaker of the monastery with a new apprentice.

My own take: If I had to put a genre to this movie I would be really in a fix. So lets just call it a really thought provoking movie. The beauty of the movie is in the small one liners which will sum up the seasons like the crux of the matter. And that is what makes you think again and again about the movie. These pearls of wisdom actually make the movie so rich in parts that you tend to forgive the guy who was writing the subtitles for missing out couple of lines . As I saw in the other movies by Kim Ki-duk, the dialogues are minimal and scenes are breath taking. There is a lot said without words and a lot left to imagination. The strength of the movie also comes from the fact that a lot is left unsaid like the woman who drops her baby never takes off her veil. Or the master’s spirit which comes to guard the monastery as a snake. At times even the shots are pretty mysterious. Like in the monastery you have doors but no walls, some are even more intriguing like the scene where the monk carves the sutra on the wood and its painted in a strange pattern. The mystic feeling refuses to cease. Over all another movie which people with a slight bent of spiritual mind would love. Strong suggestion: Don’t watch it in parts. Finish it in one go to let it sink

Baran (Persian: باران )

Movie: Baran

Year: 2001

Director: Majid Majidi

Language: Persian

Synopsis: Set in 2001 when a lot of Afghan refugees had come to Iran. the story begins in one of the construction sites in Iran where the contractor breaks the rules and employs a lot of cheap Afghan labour. Lateef is an Iranian boy working in one of these sites. He does all kinds of odd jobs like serving tea and making the meals. He enjoys his light work and keeps cracking witty liners. One day in an accident Najaf is injured and breaks his leg. As the only earning member he sends his son Rahmat to the site as a replacement. Rahmat is a weakling and is unable to do to the heavy manual work at the construction site. Hence, the contractor, Memar, allocates Lateef's easy job to Rahmat and Lateef has to help with the construction of the building. Lateef hates this shift and is very sore about it. He wastes no opportunity to insult Rahmat. Till one day when he finds out by sheer accident something that changes his life  After a lot of deliberation within myself I have decided that I shall not spoil the fun for all my readers and let them find the twist themselves. But trust me it’s a scene that makes the rest of the movie a cinematic experience not worth missing.

My own take: Baran is by far the most sensitive movie I have ever seen. The movie scenes are so subtle and the mood is so quiet and subdued that it’s a rare find. The strongest point of Majidi movies I feel is that there is no real villain out to ruin anybody’s life. Situations are all normal life situations; the drama comes from everyday dilemmas. The characters are all doing their job and making the choices which work best for them yet there is room for complications, for love, for pain, for agony, for helplessness, for courage, for stupidity. The characters are not even caught in a never ending whirlwind of chaos or bad luck but plain lives meeting unexpected twists. The other strength of the movie lies in its rare display of love in a different society itself. The appreciation of the beauty happens automatically when you see that how you really don’t need dialogues or words to express love and compassion. Must watch for people who like movies of Satyajit Ray. The genre is the same. Special thanks to Jerry Jose for gifting me this movie.

In the Mood for Love (Cantonese)

Movie: In the Mood for Love

Year: 2000

Director: Wong Kar-wai

Language: Cantonese

Synopsis: Chow and So become next door neighbours in an apartment in Hong Kong. Each has a spouse who is working and often leaves them alone on overtime shift. Despite the presence of a friendly landlady, Mrs Suen, and bustling, mahjong-playing neighbours, Chow and So often find themselves alone in their rooms, and they begin to strike up a friendship. Very soon they find out that their spouses are having an affair and all their long absence is actually because they spend time together. Chow insists that they re-enact the scenes that they might have had. Very soon its obvious to casual onlookers that Chow and So are more than friends. Chow and So are however convinced that they are no more than friends and will not end up like their spouses. However, as time passes, Chow falls in love with So. Firm in his moral convictions that forbid adultery, he leaves Hong Kong for a job offered by his old friend in Singapore. Watch it to know if they meet

My own take: The biggest dilemma which sets the movie apart is the simple fact that does your partners adultery makes yours legitimate? And more importantly does it give you a higher plane? Does this plane actually give you a sense of self righteousness and does it make you feel good because people will feel you did well. Too many questions but that’s what the movie is about. After a point in time you feel the same feeling that Samsara left you with. The dilemma remains on if the desire should be fulfilled or conquered. The other strong point of the movie is the excellent way the story is told. The treatment is very subtle and is shot in dim light for most of the time. Finally I think the last part of the movie takes the cake. Very different way of approaching the subject.

Infernal Affairs (Cantonese: Mou Gaan Dou)

Movie: Infernal Affairs

Year: 2002

Director: Andrew Lau and Alan Mak

Language: Cantonese

Synopsis: The Prologue opens with the introduction of Hon Sam, a Triad boss and the primary antagonist of the film. Sam is sending a number of young, green gangsters to the police academy as moles—amongst them is one called Lau Kin-Ming. At the same time another person named Chen Wing-Yan is shown joining the police force. Although he manages to impress the Superintendent Wong Chi-Shing and the police academy principal Yip, Yan is expelled from the academy. In reality Yan becomes an undercover reporting directly to only Wong and Yip. Yan's undercover job becomes stressful while Ming quickly climbs the ladder in the police department. A cat and mouse chase begins between the two moles as they cross paths.

My own take: The movie shot Hong Kong movie industry into instant fame and was their biggest grosser. To top it Martin Scorsese made “Departed” in 2006 and gave another round of fame to the movie. The first word that strikes you when you watch the movie is- slick. The movie builds in a fascinating intrigue and thriller fashioned with a lot of twists and turns. The real good part of this movie is that contrary to gangster movies which somehow give you a feeling that there is an element of virtue and halo effect in crime; it builds on the basic premise that it’s a business. The pace at which the story moves is amazing and the editing is awesome. Without breaking the bubble for you just a note: watch out for the Morse code scene and the lift scene :). I am sure you will itch to watch part 2 and 3 also.

Sex and Lucia (Spanish: Lucía y el sexo)

Movie: Sex and Lucia

Year: 2001

Director: Julio Medem

Language: Spanish

Synopsis: The movie begins with Lucia trying to console Lorenzo who is depressed. By the time she gets back home, he is gone. The movie then travels six years back when Lorenzo had met Elena for a night and they had shared exactly 3 piece of information with each other. They part ways and have no means of meeting again. Lorenzo is sitting at a café where he meets Lucia and she professes her love for him. They move in and start living together while Lorenzo starts a new book. Fate takes a turn when Lorenzo realizes that he has a daughter in the same city. He tries getting close to her through the nanny. I better not tell anything beyond this as it will spoil the fun :)

My own take: To say that the movie is complicated is an understatement. The strength of the movie lies in the plot. The story as it unfolds is like spaghetti has characters playing multiple roles in each others life. Though we have seen this concept in movies like “Crash” yet its different here. The characters are not ones in the outside of the other story but are an integral part. Somewhere in the story Lorenzo says that there is a hole in the story from which the story remerges at the top. Somehow the movie is also like that. Paz Vega is amazing in the movie

Samsara (Tibetan)

Movie: Samsara

Year: 2001

Director: Nalin Pan

Language: Tibetan

Synopsis: Tashi has been raised as a Buddhist monk and is on his way to become a monk of repute. When he gets erotic phantasms as an adolescent, his master tries to get his mind away from his desires. On one of his trips to the village he dreams of the host Pema coming to her. Once he is told his hottest dream was real, Tashi decides to leave the monastery and marries Pema, who was actually engaged with local stone-mason Jamayang. The ex-lama soon becomes a rich land-owner himself, and makes a killing from his harvest by bringing it to the city instead of selling at half price to the local merchant Dewa. He raises a bright son, Karma. Life continues and he gets more and more engrossed in worldly matters till one day he commits infidelity, that day forces Tashi to reconsider his life.

My own take: The tagline of the movie is "Satisfying one thousand desires or conquering just one...". In many ways the enigma of the movie is in the way it would use the zen way to unfold the story. The movie starts with a kaon on how to make a drop of water infinite. And as the movie progresses the answer emerges. Time and again the beauty of the movie is in the dialogues which are unspoken and hints which are subtle. Those familiar with concepts of Hindu Mythology will find this movie more like a story told on what is "Maya". Definitely a movie for those who like a certain amount of spiritual involvement yet haven't taken the plunge to depths of spiritual discussions. The locales are breathtaking.

Children Of Heaven (Iranian: بچه‌های آسمان Bacheha Ye Aseman)

Movie: Children Of Heaven

Year: 1997

Director: Majid Majidi

Language: Persian

Synopsis: Ali takes his sister Zahra's shoes to the cobbler for repairing and loses it on his way back. What follows is their attempt to hide this fact from his dad who is a labourer and cannot afford a shoe immediately. Zahra has morning school and Ali has day school so as per Ali's advise they share a pair of shoes. Small adventures and mishaps keep happening during the course of the days and finally a window of opportunity comes when there is a race that Ali takes part to win the third prize which is a pair of sneakers

My own take: When we were kids and our elders used to tell us stories and there was this particular story which we found so amazing that everytime we would want to hear the same story. The elders would be bored yet we wanted to laugh exactly the way we had last time. and it was a genuine laugh that would start everytime we heard the story :) Children of Heaven leaves you with a very similar feeling. Its a story of nice people, who do the right thing always. there is a dad who instills the right values in his kids at every point. There is a brother who cares for his sister's comfort, his dad's problems, and his neighbours. The story leaves you with such a warm feeling that you actually feel the emotions of the movie moving you completely. The beauty of the story lies in its simplicity and the narration. A must watch if you like heart warming stories.

Caramel (Lebanese: سكر بنات Sukkar banat‎),

Movie: Caramel (Sukkar banat)

Year: 2007

Director: Nadine Labaki

Language: Arabic

Synopsis: Somewhere in Beirut you have this small beauty salon run by these three ladies Layale, Nisrine and Rima. Each one has a problem: Layale is stuck in a dead-end relationship with a married man; Nisrine is no longer a virgin but is set to be married and in her conservative family pre-marital sex is not accepted; Rima is attracted to women; Jamale, a regular customer and wannabe actress, is worried about getting old; Rose, a tailor with a shop next to the salon, is an old woman who had devoted her life to taking care of her mentally unbalanced older sister Lili, but has found her first love. As they share their happiness and their sorrow you find a beautiful support system which leaves you with a warm nice feeling

My Own Take: Chances are very high that you might be mesmerized by the beauty of Nadine Labaki. I surely was. I was trying to search on the net if the movie is semi-autobiographical to understand how the flow of the movie is so very smooth and pleasing. But haven't found anything supporting my view. If you have ever been in a relationship that you knew would never work out, but you were clinging on to it for fear of losing it, you will know what Layale goes through. I know its easy to hear somebody say to you that its a sign of being weak and that you must stop treating yourself like a doormat etc. but when the familiar horn beeps and you see Layale run your heart goes out to her. Or when the cell phone doesnt ring and you see her checking the network you would know what i mean if you have been there. The way the story is told is so subtle and with such minimal antics that it makes you feel good. And the most important fact is that the movie ends on a note of hope :). strongly recommended for a sunday afternoon watch.

High and Low (Japanese: Tengoku to jigoku)

Movie: High and Low (Tengoku to jigoku, literally "Heaven and Hell")
Year: 1963
Director: Akira Kurosawa
Language: Japanese

Synopsis: Kingo Gondo is almost ready to make the final kill to acquire "National Shoes", the company he has seen grow and believes is in wrong hands. The corporate battle is almost in its final stages with Gondo ready to take over the stocks he wants with his life's saving. Everything to the last piece of furniture is at stake in his amazing hilltop mansion overlooking the vicinity. 50 million yen is what he needs to realize his dream. This is when his fate takes a twist. His son is kidnapped and the kidnapper demands a ransom of 30 million yen. In the battle between son and dream his son wins and Gondo is ready to pay the ransom. But wait....before the payment is planned it surfaces that Gondo's chauffeur's son has been kidnapped and not his. The mistake is where the ethical dilemma begins. Blood of an innocent versus dream of a lifetime. To make matters worse there is a trusted associate who back stabs as he sees his mentor falter in the corporate game. He now stands to lose his house, his job and has to save the son of his chauffer. And to make matters worse the kidnapper is a very smart guy who is able to see everything in the house. What continues is a beautiful story of dilemma, hope and basic human values. The end is almost a detective thriller packed with all elements of a chase, shadowing, secret symbols, signs, smoky bars, etc.

My own take: The beauty of this movie is in the dilemma it forces its characters to go through. All major characters are shown torn between whats good for them and what will make them look good to others. I think this movie is an excellent watch in case you enjoy dramatic movies. People who love locales and grand sets this movie will not impress you. The first half of the movie is almost shot in a room the second half also has minimal outdoor shots. I feel I lost out quite a bit because of the translation because in many parts the dialogues were huge and the translation was a small one liner :). But i definitely feel that as a movie its definitely one that can be enjoyed even after 45 years.